Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HealthMarkets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 22:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

HealthMarkets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears as a blatant advertisement with an unclear notability. No reliable sources validate is notability. Wikicology (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 18:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep The article was pretty much an advertisement to promote the positive aspects of the company. I removed all of the advertisement and spam links.  I then searched HighBeam and there were numerous reliable sources about the company, but mainly of the lawsuits (state and federal) that have been filed against them and that they lost over the years.  I added a number of these sources to the article and a sentence that they have been involved in several lawsuits, which they settled.  So, the company is clearly notable WP:GNG but probably not for the reasons they want to be notable. I am One of Many (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (spiel)  @ 20:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.