Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Goes Female


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Health Goes Female

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company. Diego Grez (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, promo masquerading as an article and spam. Non-notable blog ran by some physicians. Only thing even remotely notable is that Brueggmann spoke to a magazine writer, once. On top of that, it stinks of PR and SEO, as the only "extensive" coverage is spam created by a PR agency named mw-pr; presumably the same as User:Wikimwpr, the creator of this article. Who might I add, is continuously adding bogus references to create the thin appearance of notability. -- dsprc  [talk]  21:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The shout out in Shape seems to be their main claim to fame. Fails WP:WEBCRIT.- MrX 21:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I wouldn't say it's promotional but they're definitely not notable. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I found a ref stating their books are used in school system (as an aside, my daughter has actually read their book in school), which I believe is notable. I added the ref to page. User:W-contributor — Preceding undated comment added 19:00, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bloggers with an interest in medicine and self-publicity. RomanSpa (talk) 15:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.