Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Insurance Plan of New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  16:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Health Insurance Plan of New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed by page's creator. No significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 03:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep What do you call the articles on the company in the New York Times? Does HIP own the New York Times, making them dependent? Is the New York Times unreliable? Are an 823 word article and a 1193 word article insignificant? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Other than the page's current references, can you find additional reliable sources? Two articles in the New York Times does not qualify a subject as notable and is not "significant coverage". Meatsgains (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually it does! Don't you think you should be doing the research before you nominate for deletion? Read WP:Before. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The precipitous collapse and ultimate demise of what was the fourth-largest health insurer in the state is a strong claim of notability. Notability is established with the sources here and the other reliable and verifiable sources available about the company and its history. Alansohn (talk) 01:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." Two related local news stories written by the same person published within a month of each other is not enough IMO. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Looks like just enough regional/national coverage to merit keeping per WP:GNG. National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services, NJPR, Washington Post (the PHP dealings look to be important in the story of HIP's downfall), New York Times, NJBIZ, New York Times, New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, New York Times, New York Times.... It's not actually as strong as all of those NYT refs would seem, since they're all in the Metro/regional sections, and thus would report on any significant goings-on in big state entities in NY/NJ, but it's enough. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.