Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Professions Appeal and Review Board


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Health Professions Appeal and Review Board

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This looks to me like an entirely ordinary regulatory agency, not worth an article: if the title mentioned Ontarion it moight be redirectable but as it stands, way too generic. TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article can be improved and fixed through normal editing. The creator of the article and other editors should be given more time to develop the article. WP:Articles for deletion is a guideline that states that discussion about problems with the article should take place on the article's talk page before the article is nominated for deletion. This has not been done. Best Regards,
 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 02:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * While I agree with your keep you need to provide some rationale not just provide a wikilawyer lecture to the nominator. Mrfrobinson (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Moved it to Health Professions Appeal and Review Board, as proper noun. Plenty of secondary source coverage easily found. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Changing a title because it is "too generic", when that title meets WP:CRITERIA and has no issue with WP:DISAMBIGUATION, makes no sense. Deleting it for that reason is completely unwarranted. Of course a regulatory agency cited in secondary sources (per ) is sufficiently notable to have an article. --В²C ☎ 01:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable subject but needs to be renamed. Mrfrobinson (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.