Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health insurance in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Health insurance in India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is potential for this to be an article. There is an article for Health insurance in the United States, and there are redirects to healthcare in X (country) for other countries. This article however appears to be a marketing piece designed to encourage people in India to get health insurance rather than an article about health insurance in India. The original author of the article also created the deleted article HDFC RED which was deleted as advertising, and has in their userspace the draft of User:Gaurav.jhala88/sandbox-hdfclife. The company in that article is the source of some of the dubious claims in this article. This article should be deleted or redirected to Health in India until a real article is written. SchreiberBike talk 21:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Though the article has some WP:NPOV issues and contain some dubious/non-referenced information, nevertheless it has some encyclopedic value. The article should be retained only after removing or providing appropriate citations to such information. The article may be marked with the tag at the best for further improvement of tone.  Amartyabag   TALK2ME  10:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have restructured the article and removed chunks of promotional material and some dubious stats. Significant work is obviously still needed, particularly with regard to the sourcing, but I think it is now a valid stub on a clearly encyclopaedic topic. The Whispering Wind (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has encyclopedic information and merits retention. Advertisement like information needs to be harshly deleted. It may/can be developed on the lines of Health insurance in the United States. - Rayabhari (talk) 14:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.