Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthcanal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Healthcanal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article as WP:BROCHURE, the website clearly fails at WP:GNG. I couldn't find any reliable source to prove some kind of WP:NME or WP:WEB. Chiserc (talk) 09:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Health and fitness, United States of America,  and Ohio. Chiserc (talk) 09:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I believe these type of platforms themselves receive less coverage but it is widely cited in Wikipedia and acceptable source in the medical field.G19US (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Sourcing is the website staff, the Forbes Council and various PR items. I can't find sourcing we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 14:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 13:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.