Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthleap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy A7 (corp) UtherSRG (talk) 17:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Healthleap

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Speedy contested by an apparent SPA. While the contester asserts that the problem this company intends to solve is an important one, the article makes no claim of importance for the company itself, that is, no assertion that the company itself has already been the subject of significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. Delete, but perhaps start an article on the problem which makes no mention whatsoever of the proposed solution. already covered in Health economics.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 07:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons given by nom. No assertion of notability.  Notability of a company or its products cannot be inherited from the notability of the market their products are trying to fill. &mdash;gorgan_almighty (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GregJackP (talk) 14:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no hint of notability. . . Flint McRae (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.