Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthy Living (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Healthy Living (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Free magazine distributed at grocery stores. Meets none of the 5 criteria for inclusion in Notability (books). Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 12:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- Non-notable magazine,there is no reason for it to have it's own article. Dinosaur Dan1 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There appear to be any number of unrelated magazines called Healthy Living distributed throughout the world; I'm unable to find significant coverage for any of them. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Healthy Living is distributed freely but there are subscriptions available to those outside the "free area". Though there might be more magazines than just this one but this is the one that appears first and the rest of the links are either not from the magazine, broken links or take too long to load. Whenaxis (talk) 11:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is a local freebie giveaway magazine. There is no coverage about the magazine that would establish it as notable.  The fact that it turns up first in a google search syas nothing about the notability of the magazine. -- Whpq (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No verifiable and reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I hate to say so, because it looks like a well-written article, but all the "sources" come from the magazine itself. Dew Kane (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources found, no evidence of notability found. Jarkeld (talk) 12:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.