Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heamin Choi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As per comments, this doesn't appear to be an actual proposal for deletion on notability grounds. The article needs work, but the nominator's points are not grounds for an AFD discussion. Nobody has weighed in on the notability of the subject, so I am closing this as a keep. A renomination is welcome if a specific case can be made for deletion on notability grounds. KaisaL (talk) 01:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Heamin Choi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has several issues. (1) The English of the article is poor, at best. (2) The article shows lots of bias in the writing style. (3) The articles are all from Korean sources.

Overall, it seems to be written by somebody who either knows Heamin Choi or at least is a fan of his. Sonoflamont (talk) 11:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment poor style is not reason to delete, it is reason to edit, sources can be in any language, so the sources being in Korean is no reason to delete. Bias (language advocating a given point of view) can be edited to be neutral point of view language. None of the reasons given are reasons to delete. The Korean sources may not meet RS standards, but being in English is not an RS standard. None of the reason given to delete are reasons to delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment And if all these changes are made, then we will have an article that is too short by Wiki standards. The vast majority of the statements are written like this: " Despite of the difficulty in adapting to GT car from formula car, he has won the championship for the GT1 Class."  It's not a Wiki page; it's a glorification page.  It's just as bad to make the edits and be left with a stub or less, no?   Sonoflamont (talk) 09:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. No valid reasons for deletion (instead of just using maintenance tags as has already been done) has been given. Whatever arcane sport notability rules govern this racer, someone else will hopefully comment. The nominator is advised to consider consulting actual policies like WP:NMOTORSPORT before proposing another deletion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.