Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart de Roommate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Heart de Roommate

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Single note posing as a reference. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGAMES. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Japan. UtherSRG (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Found contemporary coverage of the game in Russian here. There also seems to be a non-zero amount of coverage regarding this game's remaster, such as here (Brazilian),, here, and a rather girthy review here., which could probably be conglomerated into this article (that doesn't seem to have been updated at all to reflect this remaster's release). While it's no excuse if these articles don't win you over, I'd also like to mention that this is a relatively obscure 20 year old Japanese game with pornographic content, so finding contemporary sources regarding the game's original release, while possible, will likely require more effort than a casual skim on Google and Archive.org. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 12:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Extra comment: It seems that a subsidiary of Akella, a Russian games publisher, officially published Heart de Roommate in Russia in the mid-2000s, complete with an English-to-Russian TL. (Russian) This would be another avenue to seek out coverage of this game. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: I've added three review citations to the article; one is from the Russian gaming magazine Strana Igr, one is from the J-List blog (appears to only be a blog in name; the website has multiple writers and editorial oversight), and one is from HonestGamers ' Jason Venter (whose contributions to HonestGamers are generally recognized as reliable, see ). I also added information about the remaster, along with a reference from the Brazilian digital magazine GameBlast to substantiate it. This is far from perfect, but I believe it should be enough to meet WP:GNG, and I feel much better about voting Keep. As I found these with only an hour or two of scrounging around the internet, I'm confident I could find more domestic coverage of this game as well. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.