Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart of Nowhere (Album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Incubate. Article is now at Article Incubator/Heart of Nowhere (Album). Mark Arsten (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Heart of Nowhere (Album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON and WP:NALBUM apply here, specifically the following: ''That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article". Redirect and merge content to main artist article: Noah and the Whale for now.  Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 15:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * IT SHOULD NOT BE DELETED — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conaigh (talk • contribs) 15:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: Conaigh (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

OK I AGREE - INCUBATE AND WAIT UNTIL THE ALBUM IS OUT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conaigh (talk • contribs) 14:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 
 * Keep or Incubate - It didn't even come out yet. All of their previous albums are clearly notable so I'm pretty sure this will have notability once it comes out. Incubation is the only choice I can see making sense. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 20:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Incubate - Per Mrmoustache14, since the group's previous albums were all notable, it is reasonable to assume that this one will too. But it's WP:TOOSOON to know for sure. Currently, the article is in a position where it could easily be improved in the future when more sources pop up. I support incubation fully. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)




 * Incubate - if we're happy to userfy and the author is happy to hold and resubmit, why not? A good solution I think. Stalwart 111  08:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Incubate despite the shouty comments by the original creator, this album will almost certainly be notable on release, and the basics of the article are good quality. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment from deletion proposer: I was not aware of incubation until this deletion discussion. Having reviewed it I think that, yes, incubation is the way to go in this case. Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 09:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.