Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heart to Heart International (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Heart to Heart International
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This humanitarian relief agency doesn't seem to get much coverage outside of the local Kansas outlets, and all that I found was brief notes on some mission or other, or the mention of someone being on the board. There's a history of promotional editing here, and some of that is still in the article. What I don't see anywhere is in-depth discussion of the organization in secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep a simple click on the "news" link above reveals a large number of significant independent coverage, enough to pass WP:GNG. Further, these references also pass WP:ORGDEPTH.  I'll grant that the article needs edited and the sources added, but I don't find the article to violate any policy so it should remain until an enthusiastic editor makes those changes.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Certainly sources out there of state, regional, and international, #1, #2, #3, #4 (minimum), and #5.
 * Keep - There seems to be enough news coverage of the organisation, as mentioned by the previous anonymous editor, to meet WP:NORG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.