Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartbeat (Jeremy Rosado album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 16:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Heartbeat (Jeremy Rosado album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The album fails both WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM because the album has not charted, been sales certified or nominated for any awards. The only thing the article has going for it are two reviews from non-reliable sources. Aspects (talk) 05:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw I thought the sources were non-reliable and had I been pointed to WikiProject Christian music/Sources in an edit summary or talk page discussion, I would have accepted my being wrong and this AfD could have been avoided, but instead I was reverted with an edit summary of "Nominated it for deletion." Aspects (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, you are wrong with your assumptions Aspects. This album satisfies general notability guidelines, for the album was talked about in two long-form reviews from highly reliable publications in the Christian music community. The charting criteria is just one amongst a whole host of criteria in the NALBUM framework that is based on these satisfying the No. 1 requirement. for their expertise in the subject matter.The Cross Bearer (talk &#124; contribs) 05:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep These reviews (from sources that meet Wikipedia standards for reliability) aren't the only mention of the album; just from a quick google, search I've found the following:
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * That's coverage from at least five notable sources. Enough to keep, IMO. I don't want to appear like this is canvassing, however, so if this vote is disregarded I understand.  Toa   Nidhiki05  19:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per the reliable sources in the article and those provided by Toa Nidkiki05.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 03:45, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: Although the two sources are reliable, the rest of the article has very little coverage other than critical reception. ilovemusic  (Talk To Me!)  22:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.