Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartbreaker (Pink song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Heartbreaker (Pink song)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is non-notable Pink song. It was the B-side to Stupid Girls, and was never released in it's own right. It is not going to be released. User:FergieFan101 created this article, and is linking to it as if it will be released. I nominated it for deletion and this user removed my deletion notice without giving any reasons why the article should remain. Guylikeu 01:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - or redirect to Stupid Girls. Looks like FergieFan101 is on a roll of creating these articles. Possibly connected to Weirdo1717. Masaruemoto 01:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. /Blaxthos 05:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. There is no chance this song will become a single and the article is written terribly. A redirect wouldn't work because the song is different. It may be a B-side to the first song, but it isn't the same. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bensmith53 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete - This is a very confusing article. Not only is it poorly written, but it also seems to be about a song that does not exist on any album yet. A complete overhaul would be needed to salvage anything, and that would be pointles given that the article is about a non-notable song.-- Cyrus Andiron   t/c 14:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The song isn't scheduled for release as a single, the article establishes no other notability about it (not surprising, given it's a B-side), and there's no useful content to merge into another article. Extraordinary Machine 16:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Pious7Talk Contribs 21:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very bad article, and it isn't really a notable topic. -- Wenli 00:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.