Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heat and Micronutrient Cultivation in Perennial Chickpea Species


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Chickpea. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   19:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Heat and Micronutrient Cultivation in Perennial Chickpea Species

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Admittedly, a student paper. Well written but is a synthesis of sources. 68.148.186.93 (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Completing nomination on behalf of above IP editor. I offer no opinion of my own at this time. -- Finngall   talk  17:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge to Chickpea, perhaps as a section on "Cultivation." The article can stand a bit of copyediting, but then what article here cannot? I linked it as a "See Also" in the Chickpea article for now. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 16:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Chickpea - Without being able to read the sources, one has to come with specific pointers for the SYN accusation. Quotes from sources seem to agree with the article. DeVerm (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I added merge as that is just fine with me as well.DeVerm (talk) 03:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or merge? SST flyer  02:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chickpea. The information is useful but a freestanding article about aspects of cultivation of a particular agricultural product isn't necessary.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST  flyer  02:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chickpea - It's notable, it's not synthesis (as far as I can tell), it's not WP:OR, but it's also a better fit for being a subsection of the main chickpea article. Fieari (talk) 03:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Chickpea better to be a subsection, per above. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 12:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.