Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heath high school soccer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NJA (t/ c)  11:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Heath high school soccer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable per WP:NSPORT, unreferenced. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. Wine Guy   Talk  10:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7, not notable enough to be merged. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Most high school athletic teams are not notable enough for their own separate article. Some of the achievements noted herein can be mentioned in a shorter form in the Heath High School article, but the usual practice is to include a link to webpages.  School pride notwithstanding, if we were to allow team rosters and game results for one school, we would have to do it for every school's sports team in every sport.  Mandsford (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not speedily (this doesn't really fall under A7) — clearly not a notable topic. Nyttend (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I am admittedly a bit rusty on CSD/AfD; it's been a while since I was a regular participant. So that I may better understand the guideline, could you explain how this does not fall under A7, An article about a real...organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools),...that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. Wine Guy   Talk  18:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I think that Wine Guy is right in suggesting that this could be speedily deleted; in practice, people usually differ about whether an article's subject is important or significant. To interpret the policy in the most strict construction of the words, an article about Abraham Lincoln could be speedily deleted by an administrator if it didn't include a sentence saying "Abraham Lincoln was significant." Mandsford (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – Unnotable. I could see a sentence or two on the team in the school's article, but a full page with things like a full roster and description of a controversial match (shockingly, every call went against Heath) isn't appropriate.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 02:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. GoCuse44 (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable junior club, no significance or coverage.-- Club Oranje T 21:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable junior club. --Carioca (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.