Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Deeley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 13:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Heather Deeley

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Possible failure of notability guidelines. She appears to have no significant coverage in reliable sources, just appearances in magazines. Some of the references are so vague it is not possible to verify the information such as "Mayfair Magazine 1977? Vol.? No.? "Heather Deeley" (photos taken from Hardcore (1977))" and "The Sun 1976?". Her main claim to notability is appearing in 'Sex Express' which appears to be a non-notable film. EuroPride (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Comment - There are many references in the article and I don't know if they are reliable. The content that utilised these references was removed because the citations were not provided inline. I'm not sure if outright removal is the appropriate remedy here. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. PORNBIO is depreciated. Hipocrite (talk) 15:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No, not "deprecated". As happens to many notability guidelnes, WP:PORNBIO is under discussion.   Repeating a personal opinion here from those discussions as if it were a fact, does a disservice to the consensus that others are trying to reach.  That said, it would be impossible for someone to win a notable porn award that did not even exist during their career.  That would leave us with the WP:GNG... and in agreement with the nominator, what few news sources for this 1970s adult star are either vague or apparently not online... and the mentions in 31 Books do not seem enough to show notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.