Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Jacks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 15:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Heather Jacks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't believe this biography meets the notability criteria of WP:BIO. I can't find significant mentions in multiple reliable sources. Google search for brings up mostly trivial mentions and social networking in the first few pages, and nothing in Gnews (unless she's also into couponing). ... disco spinster   talk  04:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Blatant WP:VSCA by a fan that lacks WP:RS to satisfy either WP:BIO or even WP:GNG. Happy Editing! &mdash;  10:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article itself to indicate notability. Created by a single-purpose account. asnac (talk) 13:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a nice lady, but it appears that she fails WP:BIO. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete It is a semi-interesting biography, however does not seem to meet any of the requirements for notability WP:BIO.  The only stretch for notability may be her involvement in the Chicken Soup for the Soul Series because it is a major published work.  However, it is unclear as to whether she actually authored any of the stories because there is no reference for them in her reference section so it does not appear to be verifiable. Wikidawbomb (talk) 05:39, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.