Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Starlet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Heather Starlet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:PORNBIO. Tagged for proposed deletion, but tag was removed by the page author. The only reference on the article even states that she is a "young new starlet." Per the notability guideline for pornographic actors, she has not won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award. She is not from a major pornographic magazine; although the article states (albeit unsourced) that she worked with a Penthouse photographer, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and she has not appeared in the magazine. Searching the IMDb produced no results for either her real name or stage name. Her first "major" release, titled "The Voyuer in Me", supposedly scheduled to come out in January 2009, produced no results (with "voyuer" or "voyeur") on IMDb or the internet. Even if it did, per WP:CRYSTAL, it has not yet been released. Continuing on the notability guideline, I don't believe she made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, or has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. With that, I believe the article fails the notability guideline for pornographic actors, and thus should be deleted. – Alex43223T 01:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   —– Alex43223T 01:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   —– Alex43223T 01:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Horrorshowj (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete94 ghits for name in quotes, 0 usable hits on AVN, and 0 total on XBIZ . Also fails all criteria of porbio. This should probably have been be speedied.Horrorshowj (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO and has no coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.