Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Tookes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Heather Tookes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

New article, asserts some minor notability, but how much? How notable are Assistant Professors?  E LIMINATOR JR  18:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep She is a budding researcher at a top University whose research is continuing to win awards.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 18:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment "Budding researcher" means nothing around here - that's crystal-balling. Is she writing books? Being discussed in the media? Leading a particular school of thought? MarkBul 20:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I think she passes on WP:PROF criteria #6. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not close, as far as I can see. Awards for papers written as a Ph.D student are nice for getting you a job after graduation, but unless you're extrordinary, they mean little in the real world. I see no signs that her work as a grad student was earth-shaking. Just another college prof, unless someone comes up with something else. MarkBul 20:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The point is that she got her Ph.D. in 2003 and then won 2005 and 2006 awards, which I believe is for other research done as a professor.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tony raises compelling arguments, but I'm still not thinking that this is sufficient for notability requirements.  No prejudice to recreation if/when she does cross the line. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 23:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A best student paper award and an industry grant are not enough, and her research publications are too new to have had a significant impact. —David Eppstein 23:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly a promising person, but at this point not even close to being notable. --Crusio 23:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete One single peer-reviewed forthcoming paper even in a very good journal is not notability. Far from it. An obvious beginner, in spite of a careful attempt to have as impressive an article as could be done given the facts of it. DGG (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.