Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather cameron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g1 nonsense, likely g10 attack. NawlinWiki 04:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Heather cameron

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Bumping up from speedy because notability is asserted. Problem is, it appears to be unverifiable. Google gives plenty of results for "Heather Cameron", but nothing that appears to be the person this article is talking about. Likewise, lots of results for "HC Experience", but none of it's related to a folk-music band. May be a hoax; given the author name, likely a WP:COI. Shimeru 20:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no relevant search results even with "Heather Cameron" + HC + Experience. It's likely that it's a hoax, or that the "fame" is simply exaggerated. Leebo T / C  21:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I have to concur with Leebo here... I can't even verify this person exists, as a search for her and her supposed debut album reveals absolutely nothing related to the person in this article . If we're not even sure if this is a hoax or not, due to lack of sources, it seems hard to make any argument towards notability. But maybe we're just looking in the wrong places somehow. --W.marsh 21:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax or possible attack page. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. I'm not convinced that notability is asserted, and even if it is, it's bound to be a hoax page. I could find nothing about the subject of the "HC Experience," both on Google and LexisNexis. Rockstar915 05:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Presumably this is a hoax, (surely nobody works as "a renowned lesbian"?). But even if the person exists, I cannot find anything across the web to suggest that she meets notability criteria, and since the article makes no claim to notability, I suggest speedy delete per CSD-A7. A1octopus 22:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The article asserts that she is notable. Even if it's a hoax, the assertion is what keeps it from being a speedy candidate.  Leebo  T / C  23:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. That's not actually true. Patent nonsense hoaxes can be deleted per CSD G1. Per CSD guidelines, articles cannot be speedy deleted as a hoax if the subject might be "remotely plausible." However, they can if the article "is obviously ridiculous." I, and I'm sure many with me, would argue that the record label "Muff Dyke" as well as an occupation of "Singer/songwriter/lesbian" qualifies as obviously ridiculous. Rockstar915 01:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yeah, that infobox with the ridiculous record label and occupation was added a day after my original comment. I didn't realize the user was still adding nonsense to the article. I agree with the Speedy Delete because the creator's response was not to meet our requests but to add more nonsense.  Leebo  T / C  01:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Awesome. Do you think we should slap it with a CSD tag? Rockstar915 01:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I have done that. Nonsense/Attack.  Leebo  T / C  01:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Rockstar915 01:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.