Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nom withdrew. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Was tagged for speedy, admin declined and tagged for expansion with the comment "better tag, since many of these are being found notable at Afd".

No assertion of notability (unless congregations are inherently notable), and no sources. Seeking consensus. ukexpat (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete there are 4 Jewish congregations in my hometown area alone. Vishnava (talk) 16:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment Just because there are a large amount of jewish temples doesn't necessarily meen that this temple is not notable Vishnava. The guidelines for notability for this page would be under Notability (organizations and companies).Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete At this point the article fails notability by failing to provide independent secondary sources and failing to state the temple's notability. However, if such information and sources are added that could very well change.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 03:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * editor blocked indef as a sockpuppet by Casliber per  DGG (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep for now Just started today, just one hour before it was nominated. --give it a chance--especially because the usual Jewish topics editors will not be editng for the next 9 days due to Passover. Renominate in 2 weeks if nothing more gets written. DGG (talk) 03:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Give an article a chance before you nominate it for speedy.  Actions like those of the nominator are really starting to create problems with new editors and their articles.  Remember that we aren't working toward a 5-day deadline.  Sources exist that verify the subject exists; for the time being, that's all that should matter.  Celarnor Talk to me  03:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

*Delete Sorry guys. The editor should probably have put tags on the article for a while before nominating it for a speedy AFD. However, since he/she didn't do that we have to look at this through the eyes of AFD policy. And in this case a I would say Stifle summed it up clearly.Divinediscourse (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Editor blocked indef as a sockpuppet by Casliber per DGG (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable.  Yahel  Guhan  02:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * NOTE: The article is now fully expanded with importnat information and reliable sources. The nominator is requeted to withdraw his nomination.
 * Keep because it is a notable synagogue in Manchester per the NOTE above. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn - article now asserts notability with references. – ukexpat (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ukexpat: Thank you, greatly appreciated. (It took a couple of hours to track down the better reliable sources via Google). IZAK (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.