Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaviest land animals (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. I see no reason for this to stay open any longer because the merge has already taken place. To further discuss this, use the talk page. (NAC) Tavix (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Heaviest land animals
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

About a year and a half ago, this list was put up for deletion with a consensus to merge to Largest organisms. This still hasn't happened yet, and I don't see any reason why this would happen anytime soon. I'm going to relist this to see if we can get another consensus because merging the list isn't going to happen. Tavix (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Article is useful, a likely search term and better organized than Largest organisms. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep or Merge (for real this time): Useful list that provides quick information. If still merge...It doesn't really fit the formatting of Largest organisms, but there is no reason why the table that comprises this article cannot be placed at the bottom of Largest organisms . Jo7hs2 (talk) 19:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. There is not enough information to keep this as a separate article, and people who are interested in the contents of this article will, in many cases, be also looking for the info found in Largest organisms. Just a matter of keeping all of one's eggs in the same basket. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 20:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

-
 * Comment I've done a trivial copy and paste merge of the content into Largest organisms at the bottom of at the bottom of Largest organisms. This can now be redirected. It will be up to other contributors to Largest organisms to decide if that is the best placement or if things need to be reworked.  Linguist At Large  22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.