Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Red


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Heavy Red
Non notable, one person?, company. Nuttah68 20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Heavy Red is mass-produced, so I somehow doubt it's limited to Tyler Whitman. From Notability (companies and corporations):
 * A company or corporation is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria: The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.


 * Gothic Beauty is one magazine they've had a few interviews with, can't think of any others, but HR is notable as one of the more popular modern Goth brands. Ric | opiaterein 21:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 21:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Plainly fails WP:CORP. --Xrblsnggt 02:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete--Peta 03:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete On the edge of notability. But doesn't quite make it. Viridae Talk 08:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - non-notable. There's millions of non-notable companies out in the world! -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 17:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP Bucketsofg✐ 23:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.