Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Rotation (Anastacia Album) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Heavy Rotation (Anastacia album)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page was previously deleted. As stated before, there is simply not enough information at this stage to dedicate an article to. No sources. A direct copy/paste from the artist's website. Alkclark (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G4 Recreation of deleted material. To early for it's own article, but not to early for a Hammer.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 06:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)    Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 06:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Doesn't fall under Hammer as album name is confirmed on artist's website. lk (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

*KEEP Very notable upcoming album by a very popular artist. Couldn't you just use Google to find enough sources to keep it rather than just throw it up for AfD? That comes off as being kind of lazy. -The Bitch You Love (talk) 08:52, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Striked out editor's opinion as they have been block indefinitely . Alkclark (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - future album without tracklisting --T-rex 13:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Album will probably be notable in 1 month's time after it is released. Why bother to delete just to recreate again. lk (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Different sources confirm the album title, tracks have been confirmed, reviews have been done. Why delete it? Brianentrop (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Nothing is "official" about this album beyond a title, release date (for EU, with other territories to be released later). The single is barely making an impact on radio (at this point) yet alone sales. When Universal (or Anastacia herself) releases more details of the album then the article can be recreate but to have it sit there as a stub for six weeks is practically pointless. Alkclark (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice: (as I said in the previous AfD discussion) until the track list is confirmed and there are more reliable sources on the album, I don't see why this can't be in the artist's article (per WP:MUSIC). Cliff smith  talk  19:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.