Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy crude oil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. bainer (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Heavy crude oil
Recommend transwiki to Wiktionary. Peyna 04:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This article can be significantly expanded. &bull;&bull; MDD 4696  ( talk - contribs ) 2024-July-29
 * Keep per above. --Worthawholebean 04:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Potential for expansion. Capitalistroadster 04:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per above; an informative stub. Smerdis of Tlön 05:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into Light crude oil; it seems like the articles could benefit from being able to compare the two terms without having gobs of redundancy. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-03 06:14:52Z
 * It's an encyclopaedia article about heavy crude oil, not a dictionary article about the phrase "heavy crude oil". The latter wouldn't satisfy the Wiktionary inclusion criteria anyway, because it is not idiomatic.  It is a simple combination of heavy and crude oil. Uncle G 06:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Seems pretty idomatic to me, who would guess that "heavy" in this phrase means "does not flow easily". Kappa 02:40, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename it to Heavy oil (over 500,000 Google hits). There are lots of issues on refining it too. User:Ejrrjs says What? 08:57, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Anyway, the world might survive w.o. Light crude oil, as it is the std stuff User:Ejrrjs says What? 09:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The nominator decides this might be worth Keeping after all. Peyna 14:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect this and Light crude oil to crude oil'. The provide little additional context and are better covered in its entire context. - Mgm|(talk) 17:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; it's a distinct type of oil. *Dan T.* 02:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.