Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heber's Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 05:13, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Heber's Law
This is yet another non-notable "law" someone has tried to add to the Godwin's Law page, this time by creating a whole article about it. The alleged law was introduced in a Slashdot comment today. Totally non-notable. Grouse 22:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Burn, shred and delete. WP:NOT for slashdot neologisms. Really, really not. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.129.194.20 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVad e r 23:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.