Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hecuba (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 19:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Hecuba (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources or demonstration of notability. Has this band ever charted? Durova 318 16:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * They're a signed act, have supported some famous bands and their music is available on music facilities like Spotify. It follows that plenty of people may want to find out more about them (I did, hence finding the article). There are much worther candidates for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.6.51 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 18 September 2009
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Having an agent doesn't fulfill any of the criteria of WP:MUSIC. Fronting other bands in a concert doesn't.  Having music available doesn't.  What criteria of WP:MUSIC do any Keep proponents claim this band fulfills?   RGTraynor  10:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added several sources just now. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 20:46, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * But none of the sources demonstrate fulfillment of WP:MUSIC. Durova  319 21:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm putting forward the possibility that they meet WP:MUSIC criterion #1. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 22:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Giving this another look, that's all non-trivial coverage. Even if one or two of the sources might be open to challenge, LA Weekly is certainly adequate.  Nomination withdrawn.  Good work.  Durova  319 22:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that the nomination will remain open for the time being as there remains a delete !vote outstanding. Stifle (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.