Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedgewars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hedgewars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable video game. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

*Keep - Per Zachary crimsonwolf. Livna-Maor (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Keep- A simple search on Google produces about 12 links (in fact, there're way more than a dozen...I just gave up counting). It's notable enough to have it's own forum, web page, and a few reviews from various websites, like this one: . Given enough time, it'll be quite a large game. I say we keep it for the time being and see how it holds up. Cheers, Zachary  crimsonwolf  12:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Most of the links seem to be from blogs. I can't find anything better. SharkD (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article does not show where this game has received significant coverage from a reliable source. Gamershell link above is not a review, and does not satisfy WP:N. Other search hits are directory entries or self-published sources  - I can't see anything usable. Marasmusine (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Major Linux distributions (Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, etc.) include ready-to-use packages of hedgewars. Versions for Windows e.g. can be downloaded from Gamershell, which has had 1023 downloads for the last 5 weeks . There also is a port for MacOSX . Stats at software.informer indicate that people from all over the world (Germany, Italy, Turkey, USA, Australia, Thailand, etc.) installed Hedgewars (which is mainly developed by some russia-based guys) on their computers.  --84.138.81.62 (talk) 17:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC) — 84.138.81.62 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - It is absolutely more notable than Wormux, because it is more complete. So the chances are relative high, that there will be more users than in Wormux.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.72.151.102 (talk) 12:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Only blogs and download sites mention it. SharkD (talk) 15:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources provided and a google doesn't turn any up either --Peephole (talk) 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.