Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedley on the Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 00:01, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Hedley on the Hill
Vanity and friend of gay Swamp Ig 13:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. - Swamp Ig 13:51, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logophile (talk • contribs)
 * Keep and rewrite - according to Google it does appear to be a real place. This is a link that confirms that.  I'd do the rewrite, but I don't know much of anything about that area of the world.  I'll go ahead and remove the attack material. --Idont Havaname 14:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep even little villages are supposed to get their own article. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  15:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite done by Idont Havaname.--Isotope23 18:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, might be worth rewriting the current sentence and zapping the earliest version of the page. Kappa 19:33, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep in current form, assuming that Hedley on the Hill is an incorporated community or census division under UK law. Haikupoet 23:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as real place with real communities of interest see . Capitalistroadster 01:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! Of course! Trollderella 01:06, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.