Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heerodden helicopter accident


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mil_Mi-8. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Heerodden helicopter accident

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable helicopter accident, in addition to being unsourced. The accident resulted in no changes in flight regulations, safety standards, and so on. No notable people were killed. Fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:EFFECT. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 03:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would suspect that, altough it meets WP:AIRCRASH's standards for inclusion in an article on the type (or the location), it fails the WP:GNG and, thus, shouldn't have a stand-alone article. Nothing especially noteworthy about the crash; for one reason or another, Russian helicopters crash relatively often, and Wikipedia is not a directory of aircraft accidents. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NOTNEWS and WP:GNG. - BilCat (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - news event of no lasting significance or notability. Dlabtot (talk) 08:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mil Mi-8, where brief details should be given of the accident under an "Accidents and incidents" section. As a large helicopter, an accident resulting in a write-off should be at least notable enough to be mentioned. BTW, the article is not unsourced, there is a link to a source on the cause of the accident in the article. Mjroots (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge 2-3 sentence summary to Mil Mi-8. There needs to be an Accidents section started there for this, but that seems fine. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I added an entry on this at Mil Mi-8 with references. This accident article can either be deleted or redirected there as far as I'm concerned. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not really notable enough for a stand-alone article but as has been said no reason why it cant be mentioned in the Mi-8 article. MilborneOne (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.