Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heeshem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Executed by Kurykh (claim: CSD G7: Author Requests Deletion.) --Aarktica 19:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Heeshem

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet notability per WP:CORP. Zero g-hits. Wall Street Journal article cited cannot be found and appears to be bogus. Previously speedied. Evb-wiki 15:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This article should definitely be deleted. Anon345 15:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ...care to tell us why you think it should be deleted? -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 17:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Know what, just delete it because it's too small a corporation to be considered fit for an article in an encyclopedia, and also it's probably going to fail since it is going to be working for 10 months without money until it released its final project. So since I am the creator of this article, I give my concensus for it to be deleted. So if an admin sees this, delete Heeshem at once. --Mack540 15:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Noting that the author of the article has requested prompt deletion.  Can't speedy as user request, since the article has also been elsewise edited, but I wonder if we can speedy it under A7 (db-corp)? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Uh can we just ask an admin to delete this?--Mack540 19:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No, but if you want to nuke it now, check out WP:CSD. This is how you request it be deleted immediately. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 19:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.