Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidenreich (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Ocat ecir T 16:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Heidenreich (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN band. Also nominating Heidenreich(band) (redirect page). Guroadrunner 23:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   --  Jacek   Kendysz  15:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   --  Jacek   Kendysz  15:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 04:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; unremarkable band. Two comments: (1) It is unnecessary to nominate associate redirects; the closing admin knows to look for them, and if he misses them, the bot will nail them and they get deleted per CSD R1.  (2) The primary author, User:Grayor, has created some other articles of similarly sketchy nn bands. Yechiel Man  05:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 11:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Band has a bio on AMG and I was easily able to find some record reviews and interviews that go some way to establish the band's notability within the genre of black metal . Plus, the band released two albums on Napalm Records, which appears to be a notable label in Europe's metal community. Caknuck 19:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, might just pass WP:MUSIC if Napalm Records can be considered a major label or important indie label, but not in my view. -- Steve Hart 17:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a notable group. Only passes WP:MUSIC by a stretch, and a stretch isn't good enough. &spades;P M C&spades; 21:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, weak as the article will need to be rewritten. Caknuck's links have provided some room for expansion, and as far as WP:MUSIC's definition of "one of the more important independant record labels" goes, it seems Napalm Records does qualify, as they've been running 15 years and have a roster of notable bands, perhaps only notable within the black metal scene, but using that as a reason to delete would be WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - Zeibura (Talk) 22:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.