Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Mollenhauer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 21:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Heidi Mollenhauer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The woman is only notable for singing for Esmerlda and nothing else. She sang beautifully in the film, and I wish she garnered more major roles for her to satisfy WP:NACTOR. editorEهեইдအ😎 22:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  00:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER, none of the applicable notability actually. SwisterTwister   talk  22:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.. My Google searches return a couple of passing mentions and nothing else.  Perhaps I'm missing something here? Chrisw80 (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, Imdb isn't a reliable source and that's all there is. Nor is one voice part enough for WP:NACTOR. Bishonen &#124; talk 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete - clearly doesn't meet WP:NACTOR, and not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.