Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heiko Maile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn as a commenter has located a stronger notability claim. Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Heiko Maile

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a musician, who has valid potential claims of notability per WP:NMUSIC but is failing to reliably source them -- of the three footnotes here, two are to his own primary source website about himself, and the third is to IMDb. As always, a musician does not get a free notability pass just because an NMUSIC criterion is claimed -- he gets an NMUSIC pass when reliable source coverage in media is supporting the claim. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: I've added the credible claim of significance to the article now (i.e. winning the Deutscher Fernsehpreis in 2017) and per, I agree that the subject has notability which simply had not been cited earlier. TopCipher (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's a stronger notability claim than anything that the article contained at the time of nomination. I'm withdrawing this accordingly, although the article does still need other referencing improvement. Bearcat (talk) 16:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.