Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heineken Green Room in Singapore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Heineken Green Room in Singapore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly written article, appears to be promotional. If speedy-deleted, now moot. If my request to cancel speedy deletion, I still suggest deletion after a discussion. The first sentence: "The award-winning Heineken Green Room in Singapore is the definitive electro music extravaganza for music aficionados"  is absurdly promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Advert masquerading as a article, per WP:SPAM ukexpat (talk) 03:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as certainly WP:TNT at best. SwisterTwister   talk  05:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Whoever does guerrilla marketing for Heineken failed miserably at this WP:SPAM if it went undiscovered by us or any search engine-fu for six years.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete pure spam, nothing encyclopedic about it. Neiltonks (talk) 13:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with all of above.. clearly just an advertisement ツStacey (talk) 22:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The link to Facebook and telling us to log on for updates is an obvious advertisement. Jackninja5 (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Why not G11? --QEDK ( T &#128214;  C ) 11:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.