Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heinz Winkler (chef)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear the article needs improvement, not deletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  19:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Heinz Winkler (chef)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced BLP The Banner  talk 17:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Modussiccandi (talk) 08:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Germany,  and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Not unsourced, but incorrectly sourced. Found an interview, a third party bio, and a bunch of junk about the hotel, but there may be more. Huggums537 (talk) 03:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Article is terrible, but person is clearly notable. (one source in German). —Kusma (talk) 12:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep -- there appear to be a large number of sources on the German language version of the article. Not all of them are independent by any means, but there are a few that are. To satisfy the immediate BLP concerns, I am adding a source to a DW video about him, but there readily appear to be more sources in German. matt91486 (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the the person is notable per references provided in the German version, but the article needs to be rewritten. Merko (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is currently a mess, but the German article shows that sufficient sources are available. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has a large number of recognized sources and the article is referenced. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 20:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.