Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hek Ki Boen Eng Chun Kungfu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hek Ki Boen Eng Chun Kungfu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

All refs currently in the article are non-reliable and I've searched as best I can for reliable sources to support the assertions and can just barely find any potentially-reliable sources to document that this form of martial art actually even exists, much less to document the detail here. This, like some other martial arts articles, seems to exist primarily to soapbox-defend the form's pedigree and claims to famous origins in a spammy kind of way. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 18:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Large sections appear to have been copypasted from a website - it should be deleted for WP:COPYVIO alone.Peter Rehse (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I didn't find any reliable sources that support any claims of notability. Jakejr (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This article reads like a debate without any supported facts (he said/she said). I didn't find significant coverage in independent sources nor did I find evidence to show it meets the notability criteria of WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.