Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen (charles)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 14:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Helen (charles)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:N. There is a lack of WP:BESTSOURCES as well. The articles sources rely on extracts from a couple of published books Angryskies (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Neither of the sources are her books, so I fail to understand the nominator's logic. Books published by academic presses are generally considered high quality sources, and one of them is her biographical entry from the Companion to Contemporary Black British Culture, a biographical dictionary, which certainly supports the subject's notability. pburka (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per pburka. (However, as the author of the page I should declare likely bias.) Dsp13 (talk) 09:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. We tend to keep authors published by major, notable printers. Capital is a coward, and would not publish someone who won't be important or a money-maker. Bearian (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.