Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Baker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Helen Baker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines, unreferenced, cannot find any references online apart from lulu.com, Helen Baker's publisher Richard Hock (talk) 12:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Penguin did publish her book (readily found online), but the article sure does need pruning. Collect (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Her book - Money Matters For Women - is not even ranked on Amazon, and is held by only 15 libraries worldwide. Apparently no citations on Google Scholar, and no hits on Google News.--Eric Yurken (talk) 03:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The 1993 book doen't seem to be particularly notable (and even if it were that would be an argument for an article about the book rather than about her), the other two are self-published, and I see no sign of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Mizu   onna   sango15  Hello!  23:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Don't really see why this was re-listed, but if it matters my own opinion is that this sort of publication record is nowhere near any possible notability as an author, and she's not really an academic.DGG (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. As noted above, the book does not appear notable (no published reviews, few library holdings and nothing in googlescholar or googlebooks) and there is nothing else in the record to indicate notability of the subject either under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 06:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Eric Yurken, David Eppstein, DGG, and Nsk92. --Crusio (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.