Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Helen Campbell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Bilateral relations, Norway,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: found no additional substantial coverage. QuietHere (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: another drive-by Afd, seemingly part of a determined attempt to delete as many biographies of ambassadors as possible (see the page User:LibStar, which bizarrely contains a list celebrating successful diplomatic deletions). At least two sources, "A Career in European Foreign Policy with Helen Campbell", and "INTERNATIONAL FORUM OSLO, NORWAY, August NEWSLETTER 2017", pp. 15–17, appear to comply with the terms of the WP:GNG. Other sources are not hard to find, as should be expected when someone has had Europe-wide diplomatic roles. Moonraker (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding much in terms of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. The two sources above appear to be a biography for a speaking engagement and an article in an organization's monthly newsletter and wouldn't consider either to be particularly notability-lending. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I don't know why this article links out to the subject's CV, because it reads pretty much like it is the subject's CV. Despite some deft work with the icing bag, this article merely speaks of a perfectly sound diplomatic career and is laudable for all that. It also fails the bar of notability, has insufficient SIGCOV and does not pass WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.