Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen De Cesare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Helen De Cesare

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Biography of a non-notable tennis player; does not appear to meet any of the criteria listed at WP:NTENNIS. External references include some usable sources, but they appear to be trivial or local in nature. VQuakr (talk) 06:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non notable tennis player without significant coverage in reliable sources. The claim of being the youngest Italian-Thai tennis player is not relevant and PRLog is not reliable. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  14:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 18:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Is a professional tennis player of 15 year old ranked on WTA TOUR is a good subject to merit a page in Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.164.146.203 (talk) 07:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * According to WP:TENNIS/N this alone is not enough. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  09:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Keep - per external links providing notability. Has a future ahead of her that seems to be bright. I cant personally dont see a reason to delete this article.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Is your opinion based on a criterion that she meets in WP:NTENNIS? VQuakr (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - currently does not meet ntoability for tennis players, or notability in general. That she potentially has a bright future is not grounds for keeping her now, but is a reason to defer creating the article to when she has achieved that bright future.  The external links are primarily directory and stats entries, leaving the two pieces from the one print source.  That's not enough for me to say she is notable now. -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.