Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Flynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Looking After Our Own. A merge looks like the close that will satisfy most participants, most of the time. Content can also be merged into other articles, such as the character list, as needed. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 15:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Helen Flynn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A character from the television series Spooks that was featured in only one episode (she appeared in one other in passing). Her death scene in the episode was controversial, but this controversy is already covered in the article for the episode. The character seems to have no notability independent of this episode. Khazar2 (talk) 03:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as coverage appears sufficient, but I wouldn't object to a merge to the character list, either. Jclemens (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to the article on the episode, Looking After Our Own. This article more or less duplicates the content from the episode's article. Also, info on controversy relating to a specific episode belongs in the article on the show/episode, not the character. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Jclemens ("coverage appears sufficient, but I wouldn't object to a merge to the character list, either".) Perhaps summarize death controversy, as main article is the place for the expanded detail of that "viewer reaction" aspect. Jmg38 (talk) 07:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiPuppies  bark dig 23:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to Looking After Our Own per Colapeninsula, coverage is more about the episode than the character itself. Episode article is solid and there is no need to duplicate content in a character entry.Folken de Fanel (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;  Yash [talk] 05:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 15:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.