Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen L. Harkness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 22:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Helen L. Harkness

 * – ( View AfD View log )

does not meet WP:PROF RadioFan (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as too early. Near zero impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. No sources, no WoS citations, no credible claim of notability, etc. This article is SPA-created and likely to be just a vanity page. Uncontroversial delete. Thx, Agricola44 (talk) 14:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC).


 * Comment Article appears to have been created by a small audio book company which publishes Harkness's works. Account reported via ARV RadioFan (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - vanity article. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Do not delete! Dr. Harkness and her Saturday meetings have changed my life for the better. She encouraged me to have the confidence to be interviewed by BusinessWeek as a subject matter expert on changing workforce trends and the looming labor shortage. See www.businessweek.com, technology, "The IPad's Secret Abilities" and other articles in the series by writer Rachel King. Helen is a pioneer in thought leadership. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.152.200.93 (talk) 23:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)  — 99.152.200.93 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment that's great but in order to be retained here, the article must meet wikipedia's notability guidelines which is based around coverage of her in reliable sources, not how people she's worked with have been covered in reliable sources.--RadioFan (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.