Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Helen Price

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG non notable 17 year old blogger, can find no reliable third party references. Theroadislong (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indeed, obviously fails notability. Alfy32 (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ANYBIO, WP:BIO1E. In an attempt to not bite the newcomers, I'd hoped this might be a merge candidate to World Schools Debating Championships but unfortunately that doesn't appear to be the case. While there are a few more references, there's nothing substantial enough and I agree that the subject is not notable (or it's way TOOSOON). -- Trevj (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Promising newcomer to the world stage but not quite ready for a standalone article that meets WP:BLP. Mkdw talk 09:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails notability currently.--Staberinde (talk) 15:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.