Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Rupp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Helen Rupp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No valid refs and no indication of notability. Fails WP:NM. Nick Number (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as unsourced vanispamcruftisement. No indication of meeting WP:MUSIC. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  21:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No mentions (that I could find) in reliable sources, thus making the subject fail verifiability and our general notability criteria. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  22:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unsourced BLP of amateur web entertainer, full of OR, an ORPHAN, and almost entirely PROMO. Article was created by a SPA acct, whose only edits have been to service this article. Agricola44 (talk) 21:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete could not find any Releiable sources.--  XFhumu  Talk 15:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.