Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Webberley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. article withdrawn by contributor  DGG ( talk ) 05:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Helen Webberley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I wanted this to be properly discussed rather than sitting there forever with a notability tag. There's work to be done in terms of its tone, and the creator has declared that they have been paid to create this. None of that reflects on Webberley's notability one way or the other though. I didn't find that the sources or information added up to Webberley meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO and a WP:BEFORE didn't convince me otherwise. Interested to see what others think. Boleyn (talk) 05:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: The given references are not persuasive: the subject is mentioned as "a GP in Wales" in The Guardian article; the UK parliament Transgender Equality report does not list her as a witness or provider of written evidence so can serve as a reference to the thematic area but not her biography; an author page serves a functional purpose for the Huffington Post but does not in itself demonstrate encyclopaedic notability; nor do a conference listing or a Youtube link. Highbeam shows the subject has been quoted in various popular medicine stories in Mirror Group newspapers and her Youtube uploads show various TV appearances, but I don't think there is enough to demonstrate notability in her field or, at a stretch given the media quotes, WP:CELEBRITY. AllyD (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Needs proper formating, rewording, and evidence of notability. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * delete fails GNG. obvious promotion. Jytdog (talk) 21:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and others. Thank you, nom.  --Lockley (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.