Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Wu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination Withdrawn. Non-admin closure. D ARTH P ANDA duel 13:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Helen Wu

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable martial artist, seems to have been created to back up Flying Rainbow Fan, contested WP:PROD the 'Offers private instruction' reads like an advert Nate1481 16:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination with souceslooks notable and just need of a clean-up --Nate1481 11:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.   -- Nate1481 16:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Service on national boards for her sport/discipline and coverage in a trade journal seem to denote notability. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep verified one book but not others; wrote a lead-in for a book ; if the other journal/book claims can be verified, some level of notability. JJL (talk) 18:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: multiple publications and instructional videos, strong lineage , amateur authored article and it has since been improved.  User:Dtcraig  17:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment those are martial arts magazines and not 'journals' as claimed in the article. This is weak evidence of notability but is certainly worth including. JJL (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: weak but existing references. Claims to notability established. The article could be improved with a reference other than Kung Fu Magazine. I think the article Helen Wu has more potential than the article Flying Rainbow Fan. jmcw (talk) 09:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   --

References


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.