Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena Stone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Helena Stone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No particular evidence of notability except a few mentions in the media. Article created by PR agent, who also removed prod the without a reason. Number  5  7  20:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are some TV news segment appearances (ABC and CNBC, most notably), but I'm not convinced that the subject meets the WP:NJOURNALIST criteria at this time.  Gong   show  20:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - Just not seeing enough to pass GNG. Possible COI issue doesn't help, but isn't a necessary consideration [for me, anyway] in this case. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  21:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. One time mention is NOT significant coverage, as such abc news, reuters. Fails WP:NJOUNRANLIST, WP:BIO, GNG, all. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  23:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.