Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena Wojtczak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Helena Wojtczak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dubious notability; almost all refs are from the author's own website. Reads like an autobio. Pseudomonas(talk) 10:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I searched briefly but did not find good sources. Seems like a vanity page. Has been here since 2005! 104.163.158.37 (talk) 06:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:AUTHOR. -The Gnome (talk) 11:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete almost all citations link to a webpage for a press she owns. Looks like a vanity page for me. Shocked it's been around so long! - Poetnerd (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2018 (BST)
 * Comment The AfD process may end up by eliminating the contested article. This should not be taken by either the article's creators and contributors or the article's subject to mean that Helena Wojtczak is some kind of "unworthy" individual. Probing the texts about her life reveals a person who worked for many years in (what used to be considered at the time as) a "man's job," with all the related difficulties, such as causal sexism and verbal intimidation. Wojtczak managed to educate herself at the same time and write history books about women in the workplace. Unfortunately, Wikipedia rules (i.e. WP:AUTHOR) are, or have become, rather strict about inclusion. So, we carry on, sometimes merrily, sometimes not. -The Gnome (talk) 07:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.